Everyone knows that there aren’t any decent web stacks in Python 3, right? Nobody seems interested in porting Django or Turbogears or Pylons or Plone or Zope to the new, improved much more fun to write language.
Almost true. There are a few less popular frameworks for Python 3, including my own half-finished psyclone: http://archlinux.me/dusty/2010/01/17/python-3-web-framework/
But there aren’t any full stack frameworks. But it’s not too hard to hack one together using available tools.
In my mind, a full stack web framework requires several features:
- The core server
- A database engine
- A templating languages
In addition, it’d be nice if it supported sessions out of the box and had a built-in auth framework. Basically, the more like Django it is, the better.
The good news is, we can hack one together with popular Python 3 ready tools including:
CherryPy provides a working web application engine. SQLAlchemy, which supports sqlite and posgres under Python 3 provides us an extremely flexible and robust ORM. Jinja is an advanced Django-like templating system. I implemented a very basic blog (sans authentication) in these tools in a matter of an hour or so, and it wasn’t any worse to work with than Turbogears. This isn’t a big surprise, since Turbogears is built on CherryPy and SQLAlchemy as well. We don’t have access to the extensive library support Turbogears has to offer, but it is now accurate to say that Python 3 supports a (nearly) full stack web framework.
You’ll need the svn version of CherryPy, and the newly released 0.6 version of SQLAlchemy. Jinja 2 cooperates well.
I don’t find it as pleasant as working with Django (I’m actually not a huge fan of Alchemy’s syntax), but it’s certainly a working solution. It wouldn’t overly much library support to turn it into a really nice system.