<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kyla&#039;s Arch Linux Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archlinux.me/kyla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archlinux.me/kyla</link>
	<description>Just another Arch Linux Blog site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To all of the gnome3 haters:</title>
		<link>http://archlinux.me/kyla/2011/05/05/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://archlinux.me/kyla/2011/05/05/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kyla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archlinux.me/kyla/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m honestly disapointed to see so many people saying they won&#8217;t upgrade and whining about how they&#8217;ll eventually have to migrate to a different desktop environment without even testing gnome3/gnome-shell. YOU HAVEN&#8217;T EVEN TRIED IT YET. At least upgrade and use fallback mode. (Or, &#8230; <a href="http://archlinux.me/kyla/2011/05/05/hello-world/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly disapointed to see so many people saying they won&#8217;t upgrade and whining about how they&#8217;ll eventually have to migrate to a different desktop environment without even testing gnome3/gnome-shell. YOU HAVEN&#8217;T EVEN TRIED IT YET. At least upgrade and use fallback mode. (Or, at the very least, stop complaining about how the gnome team is taking the &#8220;my way or the highway&#8221; approach of apple. Gnome is opensource. Fork it if you&#8217;re so attached.)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>No, gnome3 isn&#8217;t &#8220;perfect&#8221;. I&#8217;m personally back to openbox in my neverending quest to maximize netbook performance. But you have to at least give the devs credit for trying something new. Because that&#8217;s what they did, and not even being willing to test it out (especially if you&#8217;re already a faithful gnome user) is pretty much saying you can&#8217;t handle change and would prefer it if your computer always appeared exactly the  way it did in 1995.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
Yes, trying something radically different will mean changing your habits. It&#8217;s not the same as upgrades that minutely increase speed or efficiency. I believe that an unwillingness to change is holding us back. Maybe it&#8217;s just because I&#8217;ve been reading about cyborgs for one of my papers lately*, but maybe changing one&#8217;s habits is necessary to progress closer to a sublime computing experience? It&#8217;s at least worth a shot. I suspect that there is something out there that would be at least as good as panels.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium"></p>
<p>*in the sense that cyborgs were sort of conceived of as an alternative to terra-forming space, rather than change the environment, change the astronauts so that they can survive in it</p>
<p></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archlinux.me/kyla/2011/05/05/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

